JUSTIFICATION VIABILITY OF SOLUTION+ STAKE HOLDER CONCERNS

STAKE HOLDER CONCERNS

The brief of making electrostatic speakers had never been given before in this class. This means Electrostatic speakers had not yet been made in the history of this class. The idea of electrostatic speakers was new so it was of great concern to the stake holder, Terry Hawkings, that the speakers may not work. We were to test the theory of the electrostatic to see if it actually worked. We used design theory's which we found through research to build the different components of the electrostatic extension. The electrostatic did work in the end so the stakeholder was happy as the brief to build electrostatic speakers had been completed.

JUSTIFICATION VIABILITY OF SOLUTION

I wanted to complete the brief in building electrostatic speakers. This is because through research I found that the sound quality of electrostatic is much better than normal speakers. This is because the frequencies are dispersed better. The electrostatic makes the sound crisper and disperses a larger range of frequency. The cost of electrostatic speakers to buy retail was also much larger which meant my speakers would be more valuable if they were electrostatic. We concluded that it would be viable to make electrostatic speakers. It is viable as the extra Perforated metal needed to turn our regular speakers into electrostatic is approx 50 dollars. With the correct usage of the material we were able to create electrostatic speakers which were a few thousand dollars worth more than they were previously without the perforated metal addition. It also was viable as through research we found that previous electrostatic speakers had been made through adding small costs to the normal speakers. This means that to build the speakers we could spend approx about 10 percent of what the speakers were worth. This is clearly economically viable.